David Fuchs ( talk) 14:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC) It's "generally always" used? ) An image 100 px wide would be better displayed at 100 than 256. generally, 256px is always used for the infobox, eg from Fantasy VII to Halo 3 to Golden Sun. Also, the 256 is only the maximin size, not the size that should be used. AeronPrometheus ( talk) 00:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC) This new version looks too bland, makes it harder to read (especially long infoboxes with lots of info), and shouldn't have been changed without consensus, I say it should be changed back. MZMcBride ( talk) 23:53, 27 January 2008 (UTC)ĭoes this change the box art size, or is it going to stay at the 256px size? Salavat ( talk) 00:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC) The template's overall dimensions have not changed, and from the video game articles I've looked at since the change the maximum recommended size for the cover art or poster should still be 256px. AeronPrometheus ( talk) 23:47, 27 January 2008 (UTC) I've fixed the wikimarkup and re-added the protection tag. David Fuchs ( talk) 23:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Splendid. AeronPrometheus ( talk) 22:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Ah. David Fuchs ( talk) 20:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Arcade System is still not bold for some reason. AeronPrometheus ( talk) 20:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Fixed the developer issue, and arcade. Is there any particular reason you have "Developer" wikilinked to a disambiguation page? Anomie ⚔ 19:32, 27 January 2008 (UTC) The category "Arcade System" is not in bold like the rest of the categories. AeronPrometheus ( talk) 07:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
AeronPrometheus ( talk) 22:22, 27 January 2008 (UTC) That depends on what do you mean by 'consistency'. X201 ( talk) 20:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Show us an example, I can't understand how it would look okay for one game and not for another. AeronPrometheus ( talk) 19:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC) It might just be me, but I think it looks OK (and occasionally great) on new titles, but it doesn't look right on articles about old video games (70's, 80's).
#VG ARCHIVE CODE#
I think that the Infobox and the Navbox should share design and color scheme, does anyone else? In addition, the code that makes the Navbox operate which the Infobox and pages needing multiple Infoboxen could benefit from greatly. Sabre ( talk) 19:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC) This looks usable I guess, better than McBride's edit, but it certainly looks dull. The change isn't just cosmetic either, the code (which is more important) has been updated and modernised. Unless you want to try to convince all the other Wikiprojects to adopt the old style. The colours and borders are only a small price to pay for consistency.
#VG ARCHIVE UPDATE#
Look at other infoboxes across the project, such as films, software, characters (VG characters is on the agenda to update as well), books, they all use this theming. nlitement 18:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC) The idea is entirely for consistency across Wikipedia. Why did you turn the template into an ugly one? "Cleaner"?! What?! It's harder for the eyes to follow without clear, colored borders.
0 kommentar(er)
